Home>>Signaling Pathways>> GPCR/G protein>> 5-HT Receptor>>Ondansetron HCl
Ondansetron HCl Catalog No.GC11814

5-HT3 receptor antagonist

Size Price Stock Qty
10mM (in 1mL DMSO)
$47.00
In stock
10mg
$37.00
In stock
50mg
$62.00
In stock

Customer Review

Based on customer reviews.

Tel: (626) 353-8530 Email: sales@glpbio.com

Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.

Quality Control

Quality Control & SDS

View current batch:

Chemical Properties

Cas No. 99614-01-4 SDF
Chemical Name 9-methyl-3-[(2-methylimidazol-1-yl)methyl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-carbazol-4-one;hydrochloride
Canonical SMILES CC1=NC=CN1CC2CCC3=C(C2=O)C4=CC=CC=C4N3C.Cl
Formula C18H19N3O.HCl M.Wt 329.82
Solubility Soluble in DMSO Storage Store at -20°C
General tips For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months.
Shipping Condition Evaluation sample solution : ship with blue ice
All other available size: ship with RT , or blue ice upon request
  • Molarity Calculator

  • Dilution Calculator

Mass
=
Concentration
x
Volume
x
MW*
 
 
 
**When preparing stock solutions always use the batch-specific molecular weight of the product found on the vial label and MSDS / CoA (available online).

Calculate

Background

Ondansetron hydrochloride (GR 38032 hydrochloride; SN 307 hydrochloride) is a serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist used mainly as anantiemetic (to treat nausea and vomiting), often following chemotherapy.Target: 5- HT ReceptorIC50 Value: in vitro: 5-HT evoked transient inward currents (EC50 = 3.4 microM; Hill coefficient = 1.8) that were blocked by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (IC50 = 103 pM) [1]. The 5-HT3A receptor antagonist ondansetron (0.3 nM) reversibly inhibited the 5-HT (30 microM) signal by 70% and at 3 nM it abolished the response [2].in vivo: Acute ondansetron administration at the lowest dose (0.1 mg/kg, IP) tested had no effect, while other doses (0.33 and 1 mg/kg, IP) produced improvements in auditory gating [3]. Different doses of ondansetron were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at fixed times during the day to determine both the sublethal (TD50) and lethal (LD50) doses, which were, respectively, 3.7 +/- 0.6 mg/kg and 4.6 +/- 0.5 mg/kg [4]. ondansetron (0.25-1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) given before the challenge dose of ethanol (2.4 g/kg, intraperitoneally) injection, significantly and dose dependently attenuated the expression of sensitization. In addition, ondansetron (1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) given before ethanol injection on days 1, 4, 7, and 10 significantly blocked the development (days 1, 4, 7, and 10), and expression (day 15) of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effect of ethanol injection [5]. Toxicity: Ondansetron may be safe in lower doses used to prevent nausea and vomiting in radiation treatment or postoperatively. However, as there is a report that a lower dose of ondansetron prolonged the QT interval in healthy volunteers, this needs to be clarified by the FDA [6].

References:
[1]. Brown AM, et al. Ion permeation and conduction in a human recombinant 5-HT3 receptor subunit (h5-HT3A). J Physiol. 1998 Mar 15;507 ( Pt 3):653-65.
[2]. Barann M, et al. Recombinant human 5-HT3A receptors in outside-out patches of HEK 293 cells: basic properties and barbiturate effects. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000 Sep;362(3):255-65.
[3]. Wildeboer KM, et al. Ondansetron results in improved auditory gating in DBA/2 mice through a cholinergic mechanism. Brain Res. 2009 Dec 1;1300:41-50.
[4]. Khedhaier A, et al. Circadian rhythms in toxic effects of the serotonin antagonist ondansetron in mice. Chronobiol Int. 2003 Nov;20(6):1103-16.
[5]. Umathe SN, et al. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron, blocks the development and expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in mice. Behav Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;20(1):78-83.
[6]. Doggrell SA, et al. Cardiac safety concerns for ondansetron, an antiemetic commonly used for nausea linked to cancer treatment and following anaesthesia. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013 May;12(3):421-31.